Christ-Shaped Philosophy Project and Discussions on Natural Theology

A little over
a year ago, we inaugurated the

“Christ-Shaped Philosophy” (CSP) project at the EPS website.

Now, with over

30 contributions, you can download all of these engaging papers that interact
with Paul Moser’s

“Christ-Shaped Philosophy: Wisdom and Spirit United.” Some recent contributions
include lively discussion on “natural theology” and Moser’s “Gethsemane Epistemology”:

• 
  Angus Menuge,
  
  “Ramified Personalized Natural Theology: A Third Way?”

• 
  Paul K. Moser,
  
  “On Ramified Natural Theology: Reply to Menuge.”

• 
  David K. Naugle,
  “Traits of Christian
  Philosophers.”

• 
  Tedla Woldeyohannes,
  
  “Must Christian Philosophy Be Directly About Christ? Reply to Davis”

• 
  Angus Menuge,
  
  “The Golden Cord and God’s Economy: Reply to Moser.”

• 
  Paul K. Moser,
  
  “Rejoinder to Angus Menuge on Ramified Personalized Natural Theology.”

• 
  Aaron Preston,
  
  “Two Wisdoms? The Unity of Truth, the Spirit of the (Academic) Disciplines,
  and the Norms of Academic Philosophy.”

• 
  William Hasker,
  
  “Two Wisdoms Once More: Reply to Aaron Preston.”

• 
  Nathan Greeley,
  “Christ-Shaped
  Philosophy and Systematic Theology: Paul Moser’s Gift to Theologians.”

• 
  Aaron Preston,
  
  “On the Purported Superiority of Gethsemane Epistemology.”

• 
  Paul K. Moser,
  
  “Gethsemane Epistemology, Pneumatic Evidence, and Divine Agape?: Reply to Preston.”

• 
  R. Daniel Dake,
  
  “Paul Moser and the Antecedent Belief Criticism.”

• 
  Tedla Woldeyohannes,
  
  “Given the Evidence, Natural Theology is Here to Stay!”

• 
  Paul K. Moser,
  
  “How Not to Defend Natural Theology: Reply to Woldeyohannes.”