Evangelical Philosophical SocietyArticle Reprint

Beyond Spectator Evidence to Pneumatic Evidence: Reply to Charles Taliaferro

by Paul K. Moser

Charles Taliaferro has suggested that the epistemology underlying my approach to Christ-shaped philosophy is unduly negative toward natural theology.

This reply identifies a problem with the cogency of natural theology that underwrites my negative stance toward it.

The reply also motivates my view of pneumatic evidence for God, and suggests that such evidence is unduly neglected by philosophers.

In addition, my reply counters an objection from Taliaferro regarding my approach to death.

The full-text of this contribution is available for FREE by clicking here.

©2021 Evangelical Philosophical Society. All rights Reserved.  

This article is made public for personal, non-commercial use only.  You must obtain prior written permission for any other use.  The Evangelical Philosophical Society  (EPS) is an organization of professional scholars devoted to pursuing philosophical excellence in both the church and the academy. Interested laypersons can join as full, associate, or student members.  The EPS journal, Philosophia Christi, is a scholarly publication containing discussion of a variety of topics that are of interest to the philosopher and to the philosopher of religion.

For membership information, please visit www.epsociety.org or you may contact us by phone or e-mail.