Articles and materials offered by the EPS

EPS Article Library

Replies to Moser and Di Ceglie on Christ-Shaped Philosophy

by Graham Oppy

This paper continues the discussion on "Christ-Shaped Philosophy," as advanced by Paul Moser's paper

Helpful comments from Paul Moser and Roberto Di Ceglie suggest--to me--a need for sharpening my previous response.I try to do this here.

I see a prima facie tension between three claims that Moser makes for “Christ-shaped philosophy”:

  1. “Christ-shaped philosophy is distinctive in virtue of its content”;
  2. “Christ-shaped mathematics” is not distinctive in virtue of its content;
  3. “Christ-shaped philosophy” is a model for “Christ-shaped mathematics”.

I do not yet see how Moser proposes to resolve this prima facie tension.

The FREE full-text of this paper is available for downloading by clicking here.

Academic Disciplines, Faithfulness, and the Christian Scholar Christian Philosophers and the Secular Academy Sketches of Christian Virtues for Everyday Life